What we know so far
The Australian Labor Party has announced it intends force ISPs to censor the Internet. This is contrary to the current practice whereby consumers have the choice to filter their Internet connections either through home PC filters or subscribing to a filtered ISP. The government intends to censor Refused Classification content, almost all of which is legal to view.
The government contracted Enex Test Lab to conduct a 'live pilot' of ISP filtering technologies, in which DBCDE Minister Stephen Conroy insisted the trial remain opt-in to test the performance load of a mandatory ISP filter at all ISPs in Australia. Conroy confirmed in Senate Estimates on Monday 19 October that he received the report on the weekend prior. The trial report was released on Tuesday 15 December 2009 and proclaimed a success. Senator Conroy will attempt to introduce legislation in the form of amendments to the Broadcasting Act just before the 2010 election.
Why is it a bad idea?
1. The ideals of a representative democratic society oppose censorship;
2. Australians have demonstrated they do not want it;
3. There are plenty of alternatives available (including ISPs that voluntarily offer filtering services);
4. The Government failed to advise the filters would be mandatory for all prior to the election;
5. Blacklisted sites are kept secret from the Australian public;
6. Any blacklist would need to be distributed to all ISPs in Australia, and will provide anyone a concentrated list of the 'worst of the worst' web pages when leaked;
7. It is easily circumvented or bypassed;
8. It introduces delay and declined performance in internet traffic;
9. It will increase the cost of broadband;
10. Filtering products incorrectly block legitimate traffic;
11. It introduces another source of failure and Internet outages;
12. The filter is proposed to filter HTTP traffic – which is not all protocols or even the majority of Internet traffic;
13. Those viewing child pornography will take additional steps to ensure their traffic is better protected (encryption, anonymisers such as TOR) to avoid censorship, which will hinder law enforcement;
14. It will give parents a false sense of security regarding online content;
15. It will introduce a level of insecurity in “secure” (SSL) Internet connections (if HTTPS sessions are filtered);
16. Costs spent in implementing the filters can be better spent elsewhere;
17. Children aware of the filter will deliberately attempt to find filtered sites and bypass the filter;
18. Top Internet Service Providers oppose the proposal;
19. Shifting parental responsibility to the ISPs/Government does nothing to prevent societal problems;
20. Other countries have blacklisted political critics where mandatory filtering has been imposed; and
21. There are too many individual URLs on the web, that any blacklist containing only a couple of thousand URLs will prove highly insufficient in an attempt to protect people from inappropriate web content;What can I do?
- Write to your local member and Senators House Of Representatives Contact List Senate Contact List;
- Send your letters to Senator Conroy (by email at minister at dbcde.gov.au, and postal mail to Hon Stephen Conroy, Suite MG70, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600);
- Prepare to evade the filter using any of many easy methods. (Dead link as of 2009-11-30)
- Write media releases;
- Write letters to the editor, call in to talk-back radio;
- Contribute to the new blog at the dbcde – http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_business/industry_development/digital_economy/future_directions_blog/topics/minister_tanners_welcome?90046_result_page=11
- Spread awareness (talk about it with your friends);
- Sign the GetUp campaign, Be careful about donations to GetUp! Things are not as they seem: GetUp!? GET ACCOUNTABLE – Dont' steal money from Anti-Censorship Donors
- Sign the Taking IT Global petition, the petitiononline.com petition, and the Waking Giant petition;
- Tell the Australian Labor Party what you think of this policy;
- Get your anti-censorship T-Shirt;
- Join anti-Cleanfeed Facebook groups;
- Find more media articles about the filtering and update this Wiki entry (the more we can educate others, the better);
- Attend protests; and
- Remember this policy when you are at the polling booth in 2010.
Chronology and Media Coverage
2006
- March 21, 2006 – National Library Archive – Beazley Media Statement
- March 21, 2006 – National Library Archive – Beazley Radio Interview, 3AW
- April 18, 2006 – Giants say no to porn filter trial
- May 26, 2006 – NetAlert – A study on Server Based Internet Filters
- June 21, 2006 – Liberal Government announces free porn-filtering software
2007
- March 8, 2007 – Turkey bans Youtube
- August 20, 2007 – Howard government releases free PC level filters/NetAlert Program
- September 20, 2007 – Howard Government looks to implement ISP level filter for "Illegal Material"
- November 25, 2007 – Australian Labor Party wins Federal Election
- November 29, 2007 – Conroy Retains Broadband portfolio
- December 31, 2007 – Conroy Announces 'Cleanfeed' – for the first time it is revealed that the filter will block pornography and illegal material. This announcement is notable in that it says that you can "opt out" for uncensored access to the Internet.
2008
- January 1, 2008 – Nanny Rudd censors the internet, Courier Mail ("KEVIN Rudd's fledgling government has just made its first major policy blunder. And it's a doozy.")
- January 2, 2008 – EFA Attacks Clean-Feed Proposal
- January 2, 2008 – Australia's plans to filter the Internet under fire
- January 17, 2008 – No sex please, we're Labor – ZDNet
- February 2008 – ACMA Report on Development in Internet Filters – 1st Report
- February 17, 2008 – Labor Government says the NetAlert free filters are a dud
- February 26, 2008 – Filtering trials in Tasmania announced
- Unknown date – Enex test completed
- July 28, 2008 – Minister welcomes advances in internet filtering technology
- October 1, 2008 – No opt-out filtering
- October 20, 2008 – Conroy talks about Filter in Senate
- October 23, 2008 – Australian censorship minister tries to censor critic: time to go Conroy, Inquisitr
- October 24, 2008 – Filtering out the fury: how government tried to gag web censor critics, The Age
- October 24, 2008 – Conroy office must stop bullying critics of labor internet 'clean feed' censorship plan – Liberal Party of Australia
- October 24, 2008 – Cheap tricks not the right response on internet filtering, Crikey
- October 24, 2008 – 'Appalled' opposition hits back at Conroy’s Internet censorship, PCWorld
- October 27, 2008 – SAGE-AU calls for open talk on Net censorship – SAGE-AU
- October 28, 2008 – Google, Yahoo and Microsoft align against state censorship
- October 29, 2008 – Australia's compulsory internet filtering 'costly, ineffective' – The Courier-Mail
- October 29, 2008 – Is Censorship ever ok? – Sunrise Soapbox
- On or about October 29, 2008 – Sunrise debate on Censorship with "All-Stars" – Sunrise, Channel 7
- October 30, 2008 – Filter to cause World Wide Wait – The Courier-Mail
- October 30, 2008 – ISP-level content filtering won't work: Bigpond, iiNet, Internode – ZDNet
- October 31, 2008 – Protest logged on internet filter for illegal sites – The Courier Mail
- October 31, 2008 – Web filter 'needed' to protect kids from porn – The Courier Mail
- November 3, 2008 – Hands off the Internet, ARN
- November 3, 2008 – How to easily bypass Australia's internet filters for free – Sydney Morning Herald
- November 4, 2008 – Top 5 reasons to fight government ISP filtering – APC Magazine
- November 4, 2008 – Rethink needed on web censorship, The Border Watch
- November 4, 2008 – We don't want Stephen Conroy in our bedrooms, The Courier Mail
- November 7, 2008 – SAGE-AU poses three-step safe Net plan for families – SAGE-AU
- November 9, 2008 – UserFriendly.org Cartoon Strip for 9 November 2008 – Userfriendly.org
- November 10, 2008 – Filter advocates need to check their facts, ABC
- November 10, 2008 – Government uploads hypocrisy with internet censorship, The Age
- November 10, 2008 – Internet filtering? Just say no, IT Wire
- November 10, 2008 – Federal Government announces ISP Filtering Live Pilot – Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
- November 11, 2008 – Senator Ludlam questions Senator Conroy about Mandatory Filtering – The Senate (This announcement is notable in that Senator Conroy neglected to answer any of the questions asked by Senator Ludlam)
- November 11, 2008 – Net censorship plan backlash, Sydney Morning Herald (notable in that Michael Malone, managing director of iiNet is quoted as saying "This is the worst Communications Minister we've had in the 15 years since the [internet] industry has existed.")
- November 11, 2008 – Conroy seeks ISPs for filter trial, The Age
- November 11, 2008 – Internet censorship pilot to go ahead, Whirlpool
- November 11, 2008 – Conroy calls for filter pilot volunteers, ZDNet
- November 11, 2008 – Largest Aussie ISP Agrees To "Ridiculous" Net-Filter Trial, Slashdot
- November 11, 2008 – Govt urged to provide internet filtering details, ABC
- November 12, 2008 – Greens accuse Conroy of fudging facts over content filter trials, ComputerWorld
- November 12, 2008 – Conroy coy on filtered web content, AustralianIT
- November 13, 2008 – Internet filter to block 10,000-plus "unwanted" sites, Courier Mail
- November 14, 2008 – Internet filtering to cause businesses grief, SmartCompany
- November 18, 2008 – ISP filtering, Australia Talks
- November 18, 2008 – Your Turn: Censor this!, The Age
- November 18, 2008 – Fireside chats in the 21st century, ABC Opinion
- November 21, 2008 – Rudd will need stiff upper lip, Sunday Times
- November 23, 2008 – Too many holes in Rudd Government internet filter, Sunday Telegraph
- November 24, 2008 – Cleaning out the Net, Hobart Mercury
- November 24, 2008 – UQ Business School IT Manager comments on internet filtering, UQ News Online
- November 25, 2008 – Labor's Arbitrary Internet Filter Plan Misguided and Deeply Unpopular, The Liberal Party of Australia
- November 26, 2008 – Aussie government muffs plans for internet filtering, The Register
- November 27, 2008 – Activists target Rudd's net censorship plans, Sydney Morning Herald
- November 28, 2008 – Children's welfare groups slam net filters, Brisbane Times
- December 4, 2008 – Protest over Australian plans to filter websites, Herald Sun
- December 5, 2008 – Govt's web censorship will hurt economy, group says, ABC News
- December 5, 2008 – Aussie anti-censorship protests get cash, The Inquirer
- December 9, 2008 – Labor plan to censor internet in shreds, The Age
- December 9, 2008 – Telstra says no to filtering trials, The Australian
- December 9, 2008 – Government launches blog asking for feedback on plans for web filter, Herald Sun
- December 9, 2008 – The 10 sins of Senator Conroy, the blogger, Dan Warne, APC Mag
- December 10, 2008 – Hundreds protest net filtering on Conroy’s new blog, IT News
- December 11, 2008 – Australians caught in child porn ring – Acting assistant commissioner indicates p2p used, "difficult" to filter at ISP level., ABC Radio
- December 12, 2008 – New hurdle for net censorship, Sydney Morning Herald
- December 12, 2008 – Public protests against Internet filtering tomorrow, Whirlpool
Please refer to the OCAU Wiki entry on Australian Internet Censorship for more media coverage not yet documented in this Wiki entry.
ISP's positions
Telstra/Bigpond, Internode, iiNet, Spin, Netspace and Adam Internet have spoken out against the Cleanfeed proposal.
Michael Malone, managing director of iiNet had stated iiNet will participate in the "ridiculous" Government filtering trial (source). Since then, iiNet have now decided to no longer be involved in the trials: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/99484,dbcde-wouldn%E2%80%99t-agree-to-blind-filter-trial-iinet.aspx
NetXP and WebShield have been so far been the only ISPs to publicly support the filter (source 1, source 2)
For more information, see Cleanfeed ISP Positions.
Links
- Overclockers Australia Wiki page about Australian Internet Filtering
- Electronic Frontiers Australia
- No Clean Feed.com
- Somebody Think of the Children.com
- System Administrators Guild of South Australia
- Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
- Keep Your Filter Off Our Internet (run by Australian Web Industry Association)
- anti-filter.info Dead Link (28/03/09)
- The MP Score-Card
- http://fm2000.netzblick.de/filter-c.php
- ACMA's Internet Content Filtering Trial Report
Online Forum Discussions
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 62 (All posts) Dec 16 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 61 (All posts) Dec 5 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 60 (All posts) Nov 23 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 59 (All posts) Nov 7 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 58 (All posts) Oct 26 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 57 (All posts) Oct 14 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 56 (All posts) Sep (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 55 (All posts) Sep 28 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 54 (All posts) Sep 13 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 53 (All posts) Sep 3 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 52 (All posts) Aug 21 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 51 (All posts) Aug 6 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 50 (All posts) Jul 24 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 49 (All posts) Jul 14 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 48 (All posts) Jun 29 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 47 (All posts) Jun 15 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 46 (All posts) Jun 02 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 45 (All posts) May 13 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 44 (All posts) May 04 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 43 (All posts) Apr 24 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 42 (All posts) Apr 16 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 41 (All posts) Apr 07 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 40 (All posts) Apr 02 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 39 (All posts) Mar 31 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 38 (All posts) Mar 29 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 37 (All posts) Mar 27 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 36 (All posts) Mar 26 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 35 (All posts) Mar 23 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 34 (All posts) Mar 20 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 33 (All posts) Mar 19 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 32 (All posts) Mar 17 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 31 (All posts) Mar 10 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 30 (All posts) Feb 26 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 29 (All posts) Feb 20 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 28 (All posts) Feb 17 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 27 (All posts) Feb 13 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 26 (All posts) Feb 05 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 25 (All posts) Jan 29 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 24 (All posts) Jan 24 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 23 (All posts) Jan 14 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 22 (All posts) Jan 07 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 21 (All posts) Jan 04 (2009)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 20 (All posts) Dec 28 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 19 (All posts) Dec 23 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 18 (All posts) Dec 16 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 17 (All posts) Dec 11 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 16 (All posts) Dec 05 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 15 (All posts) Dec 02 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 14 (All posts) Nov 27 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 13 (All posts) Nov 22 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 12 (All posts) Nov 18 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 11 (All posts) Nov 14 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 10 (All posts) Nov 12 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 9 (All posts) Nov 09 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 8 (All posts) Nov 05 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 7 (All posts) Nov 04 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 6 (All posts) Nov 02 (2008)
- ISP Level Content Filtering Part 5 (All posts) Oct 31 (2008)
- ISP-level Filtering Discussion Part 4 (All posts) Oct 29 (2008)
- ISP-level Filtering Discussion Part 3 (All posts) Oct 28 (2008)
- ISP-level Filtering Discussion Part 2 (All posts) Oct 24 (2008)
- What Happened to ISP Level Filtering? (All posts) Apr 30 (2008)
Other Wikis
Audio Links
Letter Templates
- frankf's letter to Mark Dreyfus
- Mark Newton's letter to Kate Ellis
- Mark Newton's letter to Senator Xenophon
- Mark Newton's followup letter to Kate Ellis
- Rhys Aronson to Malcolm Turnbull
- Rhett Kipps' letter to the Prime Minister
- Letter from Elias Bizannes to Senators
- Ben's letters to local MP.
Please report responses received to the MP Score Card; this will allow everyone to better understand what support is like for this proposal in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Remember – politicians need to represent the people or they'll be out of a job. Writing them letters makes them aware of the number of voters they stand to lose if they retain their position.
Facebook Groups
Show your support by joining these groups (Member numbers are accurate as of 11 November 2008):
- No Australian Internet Censorship – 36,711 Members
- We Won't Accept It – No To Mandatory Internet Censorship In Australia – 6,204 Members
- I DO NOT Support Australia Implementing MANDATORY Internet Censorship!!! – 4,926 Members
- NO CLEAN FEED – 3,822 Members
- Against the Great Firewall of Australia – 3,373 Members
- FFS Rudd, Don't Censor The Internet!!! – 1,281 Members
- Australians Against The National Filter Plan – 1,067 Members
- Australian ISP filtering plan is stupid! – 831 Members
- Australians against Labor's Internet censorship plans – 732 Members
- DON'T LET THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT CENSOR THE INTERNET! – 577 Members
- No Net Censorship in Australia – 377 Members
- Say NO to Australia's Internet Filters – 168 Members
- Individuals AGAINST de facto Federal Labor censorship of the internet – 82 Members
- Brisbane Against Censorship – 39 Members
- No censorship of the Internet in Australia – 13 Members
- GetUp!? GET ACCOUNTABLE – Dont' steal money from Anti-Censorship Donors – 5 Members
Quotes
“When governments start covering the eyes and ears of the whole nation, however, there is a real problem. We only need to look at those governments that have taken it to the extreme and burnt books to understand that. But there are more subtle ways to inhibit the flow of ideas that we need to be just as alert to.” – Kate Lundy, Australian Labor Party Senator. – http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/29/1059244609141.html.
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." – Benjamin Franklin
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation." – Rabbi Daniel Lapin
"A censor is an expert in cutting remarks. A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to." – Dr. Laurence Peter
"All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship." – George Bernard Shaw
"I think censorship is evil, Andrew. It's the beginning of the Big Brother state, and if you start censoring matters and facts from people, it's an easy step to censor all sorts of things and they don’t know what is going on." – Donn Chipp, former Minister for Customs and Excise (covered censorship) – http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1730839.htm
"Don’t shrink from a new technology just because it may be subject to criminal abuse. Exploit its strengths, while controlling its weaknesses. This will be the way to survive in an increasingly competitive world." – Dr P N Grabosky – http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/chpornography/
"The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." – John Gilmore
"In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;
And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;
And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;
And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up." – Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)"Implementing system-wide solutions is potentially complex, expensive and may have reliability gaps." – ACMA Spokesperson, The Australian Newspaper, 01/05/2009
Monday, December 21, 2009
All you need to know that the Australian Governments Censorship Plan is Bollocks (and more)
Reporters Sans Frontières - Open letter to Australia’s Prime Minister
The Hon Kevin Michael Rudd Prime Minister Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia
Paris, 18 December 2009
Dear Prime Minister,
Reporters Without Borders, an organisation that defends free expression worldwide, would like to share with you its concern about your government’s plan to introduce a mandatory Internet filtering system. While it is essential to combat child sex abuse, pursuing this draconian filtering project is not the solution. If Australia were to introduce systematic online content filtering, with a relatively broad definition of the content targeted, it would be joining an Internet censors club that includes such countries as China, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Communications minister Stephen Conroy announced on 15 December that, after a year of testing in partnership with Australian Internet service providers (ISPs), your government intended to introduce legislation imposing mandatory filtering of websites with pornographic, paedophile or particularly violent content.
Reporters Without Borders would like to draw your attention to the risks that this plan entails for freedom of expression.
Firstly, the decision to block access to an “inappropriate” website would be taken not by a judge but by a government agency, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). Such a procedure, without a court decision, does not satisfy the requirements of the rule of law. The ACMA classifies content secretly, compiling a website blacklist by means of unilateral and arbitrary administrative decision-making. Other procedures are being considered but none of them would involve a judge.
Secondly, the criteria that the proposed law would use are too vague. Filtering would be applied to all content considered “inappropriate,” a very slippery term that could be interpreted very differently by different people. In all probability, filtering would target “refused classification” (RC) sites, a category that is extremely controversial as it is being applied to content that is completely unrelated to efforts to combat child sex abuse and sexual violence, representing a dangerous censorship option. Subjects such as abortion, anorexia, aborigines and legislation on the sale of marijuana would all risk being filtered, as would media reports on these subjects.
The choice of filtering techniques has not been clearly defined. Would it be filtering by key-words, URL text or something else? And what about the ISPs that are supposed to carry out the filtering at the government’s request? Will they be blamed, will they be accused of complicity in child sex abuse if the filtering proves to be ineffective, as it almost certainly will?
Your government claims that the filtering will be 100 per cent effective but this is clearly impossible. Experts all over the world agree that no filtering system is effective at combating this kind of content. On the one hand, such a system filters sites that should not be affected (such as sites about the psychology of child sexuality or paedophile crime news). And on the other, it fails to filter targeted sites because their URLs contain key-words that are completely unrelated to their content, or because their content (photo and text) is registered under completely neutral terms. Furthermore, people who are determined to visit such sites will know how to avoid the filtering by, for example, using proxy servers or censorship circumvention software or both.
The Wikileaks website highlighted the limitations of such as system when it revealed that the ACMA blacklist of already banned websites contained many with nothing reprehensible in their content. According to Wikileaks, the blacklist included the Abortion TV website, some of the pages of Wikileaks itself, online poker sites, gay networks, sites dealing with euthanasia, Christian sites, a tour operator’s site and even a Queensland dentist’s site.
The US company Google has also voiced strong reservations. Google Australia’s head of policy, Iarla Flynn, said yesterday: “Moving to a mandatory ISP filtering regime with a scope that goes well beyond such material is heavy handed and can raise genuine questions about restrictions on access to information.”
As regards paedophilia, the most dangerous places on the Internet are websites offering chat and email services. So if this project were taken to its logical conclusion, access to sites such as Gmail, Yahoo and Skype would also have to be blocked, which would of course be impossible.
There are more effective ways to combat child pornography, including tracking cyber-criminals online (by means of cookies, IP address comparison, and so on), combined with police investigation into suspects and their online habits. Why did your government end the programme launched by the previous government, which made free filtering systems available to Australian families? This procedure had the merit of being adapted to individual needs and gave each home the possibility of shielding its children from porn.
A real national debate is needed on this subject but your communications minister, Stephen Conroy, made such a debate very difficult by branding his critics as supporters of child pornography. An opportunity was lost for stimulating a constructive exchange of ideas.
We also regret the lack of transparency displayed by your government as regards the tests carried out in recent months using procedures that have been kept secret. Your government paid some 300,000 Australian dollars to ISPs to finance the tests. Australian taxpayers have a right to be given detailed information about the results.
Finally, you must be aware that this initiative is a source of a concern for your compatriots. In a recent Fairfax Media poll of 20,000 people, 96 per cent were strongly opposed to such a mandatory Internet filtering system, while around 120,000 Australians have signed a petition against Internet censorship launched by the online activist group GetUp. The withdrawal of this proposal would therefore satisfy public opinion as well as prevent a democratic country from introducing a system that threatens freedom of expression.
I thank you in advance for the consideration you give to our recommendations.
Sincerely,
Jean-François Julliard
Secretary-General
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Climate under attack, the chimp pans thee
Is the ETS debate sending you bananas? Can't understand why climate change action is such a hairy subject, or why Malcolm Turnbull fell to the gorillas in his midst? Well, spare a thought for Santino the agitated chimpanzee, who took direct action to protest against his environmental conditions but soon discovered that railing against the status quo comes at a high price when dealing with humans.
Santino, who lives in Sweden's Furuvik Zoo, is no ordinary chimp. In fact, he's pushed back the boundaries of what is considered human behaviour. Appalled at his incarceration and the steady flow of gawking humans ruining his environment, this chimp took direct action. Over a period of some months, the 31-year-old was observed before opening hours chipping and stockpiling rocks to ensure a supply of strategically placed ammunition to throw at interlopers.
Cognitive scientist Mathias Osvath, who published a report on Santino in Current Biology, said that such complex planning suggested he could anticipate future events and devise ways of dealing with them. ''Planning like this is supposed to be uniquely human,'' Osvath said.
So there you go. Smart chimp wants to protect his environment and plans ahead in order to do so. Obviously not a contender for Tony Abbott's frontbench.
Unfortunately, poor old Santino didn't really plan for what happened next. ''They have castrated the poor guy,'' a shamefaced Osvath admitted. That's right, by railing against the system and expanding our knowledge about the intelligence of other animals, brave Santino copped a typically pragmatic human solution to calm him down and shut him up. Perhaps we should start worrying about what really happened to Peter Garrett?
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Photo Hunt: Fast
Friday, December 18, 2009
Santa promotes obesity and drink-driving, claims health expert - Telegraph
Dr Nathan Grills from Monash University in Australia said the idea of a fat Father Christmas gorging on brandy and mince pies as he drove his sleigh around the world delivering presents was not the best way to promote a healthy and safe lifestyle among the young.
Writing on bmj.com, Dr Grills said: "Santa only needs to affect health by 0.1 per cent to damage millions of lives."
Eat your carrots and have a glass of milk Doctor. Pass the Christmas MRE's.
Skywatch Friday
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Be nice to America Or we'll bring (peace and) democracy to your country - Funny Bumper Stickers
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Photo Hunt Undesirable
Friday, December 11, 2009
Carrier Pigeons ply the waterways of Bangaldesh
CAN pigeons float? The question pops into my mind and lodges there as I board Parabat 2, a passenger ferry bound from Dhaka for the islands and waterways fringing the Bay of Bengal.
In Bangladesh, parabat means pigeon, not the most reassuring name for a dilapidated vessel about to sail through one of world's largest river systems. "Luxury River Travels with a Differents" reads my ticket. Those "differents" being, I hope, that this pigeon won't sink.
My ferry is heading for the bustling delta town of Barisal, a former British colonial outpost and one of the most atmospheric places I have visited in 20 years of exploring Asia. We are due to depart at 8.30pm from Sadarghat boat terminal in Old Dhaka, the insanely crowded heart of an already frenetic city.
Evening is rush hour at Sadarghat. I stand on the top deck of the three-storey Parabat 2 and watch the hypnotising tableau below. A constant stream of humanity flows up gangplanks and on to ferries moored tightly together along rusting pontoons. Ships' bells and claxons, the cries of porters, vendors and beggars, the muezzins announcing evening prayer . . . it is a cauldron of noise.
Scotland's oldest book goes on public display for first time
The pocket-size book of Psalms has been described as Scotland's version of the celebrated Book of Kells in Dublin.
It has illuminations in vivid green, red, purple and gold and the script is still bold and clear, with the text of the Psalms in Latin.
The book was probably commissioned for a figure of some importance, such as St Margaret, Queen of Scotland, and it is thought likely the work was produced at the monastery of Iona.
The University of Edinburgh has held the book in its collection since the early 17th century but has never put it on public display.
I wonder if there is a Google Books or tablet version?
Skywatch Friday
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Hey Plod Can you lend me a quid (or two) - Prince Charles taps police for loan
Ken Wharfe, a former protection officer for Princess Diana, said it was commonplace among him and his former colleagues and that there was "nothing sinister about it".
"It is very rare for members of the Royal family to carry cash or credit cards so protection officers paying for things is quite a normal practice," he said.
I'm going to try this the next time I get a speeding ticket.
Abbott showcases new Shadow Cabinet
Kevin Rudd as the Milky Bar Kid
Striking resemblance. One free milky bar with every vote for the ETS in the Senate.
Earl Cooley - Veteran Smokejumper RIP
Candidates for smokejumping are today required to pass rigorous physical examinations and undergo years of training. But when, on July 12 1940, Earl Cooley stood ready to jump from a small TriMotor aeroplane as it buzzed at 1,500ft over Martin Creek in the Nez Perce National Forest, Idaho, procedures were altogether more improvised. "Our training consisted of a man saying: 'This is your parachute. You know what fire is. We jump tomorrow'," he recalled later.
Such rudimentary preparation seemed to invite disaster – and it duly arrived, as the lines of Cooley's parachute got tangled and it failed to open properly. His fall was, however, cushioned by the upper branches of a spruce tree and he – and the art of smokejumping – survived. Dusting himself down, he and his partner, Rufus Robinson, located the equipment and provisions that had been dropped in their wake, and made their way to the fire. Over the next 12 hours they successfully put it out.
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Scots eat junk food, are dangerous and difficult to understand, claims American travel writer - The Daily Record
Scots eat junk food, are dangerous and difficult to understand, claims American travel writer
Dec 7 2009 By David Taylor
A TRAVEL guide to Scotland has been blasted for suggesting residents eat too many takeaways, are violent and are difficult to understand.
Scotland For Dummies was written by a journalist from America - one of the most obese and violent nations in the world.
The book describes Scotland as "an administrative region within Great Britain" and warns would-be visitors to be on their guard.
Author Barry Shelby tells readers that, although Scots speak English, visitors may be unable to understand different accents.
He says: "With the local expressions, heavy accents and thick burr, it can occasionally sound like a foreign language.
"Even Scots from one region of the nation don't know what someone from another is saying. Ask those you don't understand to repeat themselves or to slow down."
In another of Shelby's guides, Frommer's Edinburgh And Glasgow, he says: "Like most big cities in the western world, Edinburgh and Glasgow have their share of crime.
"Knives present a problem, and fights can flare up unexpectedly, particularly in Glasgow during heated football matches."
And he advises visitors to claim allegiance to Partick Thistle to avoid trouble if challenged by a Glaswegian over who they support.
The book, intended for first-time visitors, is part of a series which has sold millions of copies worldwide.
It also dismisses Aberdeen and Inverness as "lacking in attractions".
Speaking about Scottish cuisine, Shelby adds: "Most of the population still seem to subsist on takeaway fish and chips."
Culture minister Fiona Hyslop said the guide was guilty of "sweeping generalisations and stereotypes".
But Shelby, who has lived in Scotland for more than 12 years and now lives as a crofter and freelance journalist on the Isle of Lewis, defended his book.
He said: "I'm a naturalised Brit and an adopted Scot, so it was certainly not my intention to offend anyone."
A TRAVEL guide to America has been blasted for suggesting residents eat too many takeaways, are violent and are difficult to understand.
America For Dummies was written by a journalist from America - one of the most obese and violent nations in the world.
The book warns would-be visitors to be on their guard.
Author Barry Shelby tells readers that, although Americans speak English, visitors may be unable to understand different accents.
He says: "With the local expressions, heavy accents and thick burr, it can occasionally sound like a foreign language.
"Even Americans from one region of the nation don't know what someone from another is saying. Ask those you don't understand to repeat themselves or to slow down."
In another of Shelby's guides, Frommer's Edinburgh And Glasgow, he says: "Like most big cities in the western world, New York and Los Angeles have their share of crime.
"Guns present a problem, and fights can flare up unexpectedly, particularly during heated drug deals."
And he advises visitors to claim allegiance to God to avoid trouble if challenged by a Glaswegian over who they support.
The book, intended for first-time visitors, is part of a series which has sold millions of copies worldwide.
It also dismisses Houston and Omaha as "lacking in attractions".
Speaking about American cuisine, Shelby adds: "Most of the population still seem to subsist on takeaway pizza."
Culture minister Homer Simpson said the guide was guilty of "sweeping generalisations and stereotypes".
But Shelby, who has lived in Tennessee for more than 12 years and now lives as a cocaine addict and freelance crack cocaine producer , defended his book.
He said: "I'm a naturalised Yank and so it was certainly not my intention to offend anyone."
Saturday, December 05, 2009
Photo Hunt Curved
The finished product.
Friday, December 04, 2009
Skywatch Friday
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Tiger Woods car crash reenactment. Funny animation from Chinese TV station
Those Chinese Spies. They are everywhere.





